Amazon just released a Superbowl ad and it is hilarious!
Amazon gamely admits that it has tried incorporating Alexa, the company's smart assistant in a lot of products that could have been avoided. Amazon cheekily admits that they have gone out of the way in trying to put Alexa in everything from a toothbrush to a spaceship.
Nice ad. But, let us step back and actually consider this digital assistant / smart things phenomenon.
Just a couple of weeks back, hot on the heels of this years CES event, Google announced that they have now 1 billion GOOGLE ASSISTANT active devices and The Verge carried out an exclusive that Amazon has sold over 100 million ALEXA devices.
These are HUGE numbers!! These are impressive numbers. If you were to dive a little deeper into the distribution of these devices, Amazon might have a slight edge as people have gone out and purchased devices with built-in Alexa whereas Google Assistant is baked into an Android phone, thus inflating the number of "active devices".
But, I digress. This piece is not about who is winning the war and whether Alexa is better than Google Assistant or otherwise. I want to address the situation that we find ourselves in. What situation, you ask? the situation of having a smart assistant in every electronic device. While it started out as a war between Amazon & Google, the likes of Samsung (BIXBY), Apple (SIRI) are also making a splash. For all practical purposes, I do not consider CORTANA as a competitor.
This month during CES, we saw a number of things that had a smart assistant built-in. From alarm clocks to microwaves. The one that takes cake was a piece of wood with an electronic display to show you the weather!! No kidding! Why would anyone want that? Or why would you want a "smart" microwave?
I clearly seem to be missing something. Do not get me wrong. I like the basic concept of a smart home. I myself have about 6 "smart" gadgets at home. These connected devices make my life simpler. They are practical. For instance, at night, I like the convenience of being able to switch off the light from an app or just saying Goodnight. I also like to just get my home device to play a song with a simple command rather than fishing my phone out! I am of the belief that these connected devices should have a practical use. They should not be made just because it is possible!
Let me give you an example of the Samsung Family Hub refrigerator. It is loaded with 3 cameras and internet-enabled tablet. It costs a cool $5000!!!!! Why?
A) You can leave notes on the big display for family members?
B) Playing videos in your kitchen?
C) Display your grocery list?
D) Click pics with your fridge?
Sounds more like a gimmick than being practical. Just by making it sound like an "upgrade" from your "dumb" appliance/gadget, customers are led to buy something that is exorbitant. My question to Samsung is - If your phone & tablets don't last longer than 18-24 months, how is that tablet on the fridge going to hold up for 5-6 years or more? You dot expect us to upgrade our refrigerator every 2 years, do you? What about security? Since it is a connected device, would you give security updates as long as we keep the refrigerator? the answer is a BIG no!
The other reason why it is not advisable to make everything "smart" is that there are glaring security issues. All these devices are vulnerable to hacking and are easily exploitable. Here is an instance of the getting HACKED last month. SCARY is an understatement.
Imagine a scenario wherein someone takes full control of all the gadgets of your household remotely. The lights go off when you want them on at night. The TV shows what the hacker needs to show you instead of the cute Cat videos.
Let me again reiterate that I am not against the idea of building a smart home. I am in on it. The thing is, you need to be absolutely sure of the utility of the device before taking the plunge. Once decided, ensure that you have all the security checks in place.
If any product does not do anything that you want it to do in a simpler, cheaper and effectively in an already existing manner, it is certainly not smart. Ans, you shall not be smart in buying it!!
Here are my key takeaways:
1) A smart home (or multiple smart devices) MUST ensure both simplicity and privacy. If anyone is being compromised, it is not worth it.
2) Currently, these smart devices are more beneficial for manufacturers and advertisers. They use whatever you say and store it in a remote server. Share smartly. Do not be at the mercy of these devices.
3) I am not the one to go all in on a single HUB. I am just not comfortable dumping all my info into or to one device.
What do you guys think? What is your take on this issue? Are you a digital person or an Analog person? or a bit of both (like me)?
Let me know if you want everything to be smart or you just like life as it is now.
Finally, if you want to start taking baby steps in building a smart home, do let me know. I could help you with it or just write a blog or shoot a video about it.
Amazon gamely admits that it has tried incorporating Alexa, the company's smart assistant in a lot of products that could have been avoided. Amazon cheekily admits that they have gone out of the way in trying to put Alexa in everything from a toothbrush to a spaceship.
Nice ad. But, let us step back and actually consider this digital assistant / smart things phenomenon.
Just a couple of weeks back, hot on the heels of this years CES event, Google announced that they have now 1 billion GOOGLE ASSISTANT active devices and The Verge carried out an exclusive that Amazon has sold over 100 million ALEXA devices.
These are HUGE numbers!! These are impressive numbers. If you were to dive a little deeper into the distribution of these devices, Amazon might have a slight edge as people have gone out and purchased devices with built-in Alexa whereas Google Assistant is baked into an Android phone, thus inflating the number of "active devices".
![]() |
| Source: Freepik |
But, I digress. This piece is not about who is winning the war and whether Alexa is better than Google Assistant or otherwise. I want to address the situation that we find ourselves in. What situation, you ask? the situation of having a smart assistant in every electronic device. While it started out as a war between Amazon & Google, the likes of Samsung (BIXBY), Apple (SIRI) are also making a splash. For all practical purposes, I do not consider CORTANA as a competitor.
![]() |
| Digital Assistant War (Source: Google Photos) |
This month during CES, we saw a number of things that had a smart assistant built-in. From alarm clocks to microwaves. The one that takes cake was a piece of wood with an electronic display to show you the weather!! No kidding! Why would anyone want that? Or why would you want a "smart" microwave?
I clearly seem to be missing something. Do not get me wrong. I like the basic concept of a smart home. I myself have about 6 "smart" gadgets at home. These connected devices make my life simpler. They are practical. For instance, at night, I like the convenience of being able to switch off the light from an app or just saying Goodnight. I also like to just get my home device to play a song with a simple command rather than fishing my phone out! I am of the belief that these connected devices should have a practical use. They should not be made just because it is possible!
Let me give you an example of the Samsung Family Hub refrigerator. It is loaded with 3 cameras and internet-enabled tablet. It costs a cool $5000!!!!! Why?
A) You can leave notes on the big display for family members?
B) Playing videos in your kitchen?
C) Display your grocery list?
D) Click pics with your fridge?
Sounds more like a gimmick than being practical. Just by making it sound like an "upgrade" from your "dumb" appliance/gadget, customers are led to buy something that is exorbitant. My question to Samsung is - If your phone & tablets don't last longer than 18-24 months, how is that tablet on the fridge going to hold up for 5-6 years or more? You dot expect us to upgrade our refrigerator every 2 years, do you? What about security? Since it is a connected device, would you give security updates as long as we keep the refrigerator? the answer is a BIG no!
The other reason why it is not advisable to make everything "smart" is that there are glaring security issues. All these devices are vulnerable to hacking and are easily exploitable. Here is an instance of the getting HACKED last month. SCARY is an understatement.
Imagine a scenario wherein someone takes full control of all the gadgets of your household remotely. The lights go off when you want them on at night. The TV shows what the hacker needs to show you instead of the cute Cat videos.
Let me again reiterate that I am not against the idea of building a smart home. I am in on it. The thing is, you need to be absolutely sure of the utility of the device before taking the plunge. Once decided, ensure that you have all the security checks in place.
If any product does not do anything that you want it to do in a simpler, cheaper and effectively in an already existing manner, it is certainly not smart. Ans, you shall not be smart in buying it!!
Here are my key takeaways:
1) A smart home (or multiple smart devices) MUST ensure both simplicity and privacy. If anyone is being compromised, it is not worth it.
2) Currently, these smart devices are more beneficial for manufacturers and advertisers. They use whatever you say and store it in a remote server. Share smartly. Do not be at the mercy of these devices.
3) I am not the one to go all in on a single HUB. I am just not comfortable dumping all my info into or to one device.
What do you guys think? What is your take on this issue? Are you a digital person or an Analog person? or a bit of both (like me)?
Let me know if you want everything to be smart or you just like life as it is now.
Finally, if you want to start taking baby steps in building a smart home, do let me know. I could help you with it or just write a blog or shoot a video about it.




